So, was it possible that the intruder planned on involving the suitcase as part of the kidnapping? In my estimation, it doesn't seem likely, though, of course, I could be mistaken. For example, if the suitcase was intended as part of the kidnapping, leaving the house that way, why was it found with several items inside it, if I'm not mistaken? In other words, it would be empty after the intruder determined it wouldn't be big enough? There are possible scenarios such as that the intruder preferred a walk away from the house with a ruse and without force used, but that force and the suitcase became a third or fourth, not necessarily planned beforehand but thought up at that time, that night. But, no, I don't believe the intruder(s) considered using the suitcase in that way. I do believe it was placed by the window to allow an easier way out of the broken window, that is was used that way. And I also believe that the suitcase was packed by the intruder(s) and that both the white blanket and pink clothing found in the wine cellar were originally placed in the suitcase? (And could fibers be transferred that way?) But why would, whether one or two intruders, they or he have wanted to carry along a suitcase on the way back to the woods?. In other words, if there were 2 blankets, the pink clothing, and a book packed by the intruders in the suitcase, and perhaps a few other items?, then it would seem likely that they wanted to take it with them out of the house unless they needed to weigh the suitcase down somewhat or maybe not weigh it down so much as fill it up so that it would better serve the purpose of stepping on it to get out the window? But why would that involve a book? A packed suitcase, if presumed packed by the intruder(s), makes more sense, in my estimation, if they intended on hiding in the basement to collect the ransom money and leave the house in a stolen vehicle? Nevertheless, if I had to forward my best educated guess, I would say that the suitcase was packed by the intruder(s) with at least the 4 items I mentioned and that they intended on carrying it along in a walk back to a wilderness area.
So, like I said, I believe it was more likely that the intruder would not collect the ransom money and it was just a kidnapping that involved a walk to the intruder's wilderness hideout and that is the reason that I believe what would have been a kidnapping became murder. In other words, I believe he was met with resistance and balked at proceeding with the walk away from the house he'd planned. Perhaps a loud scream was part of the resistance that led to the intruder's abandoning of his kidnapping plans. I believe he would have preferred that a ruse was used as the first option and intimidation through force as a second option concerning a walk away from the house, but, I believe he was met with resistance. He may have been resisted because I believe, as planned, he committed criminal acts in the basement that were coerced within some sort of ruse, possibly as a continuation of the original ruse. In other words, I believe that the male intruder intended to assault in the basement, though within a limited amount of time, and then leave the house. But met with resistance to either approach, whether a ruse or attempts to intimidate, he ended up committing a more prolonged assault and then murder after he'd made the decision to abandon his kidnapping plans.(keeping in mind how defective this person is.) So, if pineapple was eaten and the bowl of pineapple found in the kitchen area was not coincidentally found in, generally speaking, the path from the spiral stairs to the basement, if I'm not mistaken on any of that, the possible pineapple evidence could indicate that the intruder spent a lot more time in the basement than he'd planned because he'd changed his plans or otherwise his plans were altered by resistance.
Q. KITE, why do you think that the intruder asked for the arguably odd amount of $118,000 dollars in the ransom note?
A. Because I believe he was alluding to The Book of Isaiah's 1:18, which I believe he interpreted as being about sinning and repenting using the color red for sin and white for repent. This is why, in my opinion, he went on to say that the $118,000 be placed in a BROWN paper bag, since, if I'm not mistaken, the color brown can represent humility. (By using the words "FAT CAT later in the ransom note", I believe he continues this theme of considering wealth as sin.) Also, the ransom writer may have used the dollar sign before the numbers 118,000 to allude to the word ISAIAH since the dollar sign he penned, in my estimation, looks similar to the letters (I) and (S). In my estimation, my opinion, the ransom note is a series of spiritually slanted sentences that, for the most part, allude to sinning and repenting, those which I've listed in previous posts. I believe that the male intruder was rationalizing or else masking his kidnapping plans within a theme of sinning and repenting as a way to manipulate, whether an accomplice, if he had one, or, ultimately, the authorities, if and when he was arrested.
Q. KITE, what about the possibility that staging of the scene was involved?
A. Yes, I do believe that the wine cellar room was staged by the intruder, if "staged" is the right word? I believe he may have drawn a RED heart on her hand and then put her hands over her head so that the heart would be seen and that he intentionally wrapped the WHITE blanket in such a way that he was alluding to repentance?, if that's the correct word? In other words, it was something similar to the use of $118,000. And I also believe he intentionally put the PINK clothing in or near the WHITE blanket. So, with the colors RED, WHITE and PINK, in my opinion, he has staged the scene so that if he is apprehended by authorities he can reveal what the colors mean to him. RED heart would be a sinful heart that needs to repent. (of course, I'm writing this from the perspective of a defective-minded criminal who, in my opinion, is misusing spiritual text to rationalize his sociopathic or else criminal behavior.) Wrapped WHITE blanket is REPENT. And, the PINK clothing, in my opinion is something similar to line in the ransom note...
(The delivery will be exhausting so I advise you to be rested.)
With that line I believe the ransom writer is alluding to birth with the words exhausting delivery. In my estimation, when he writes about.....(if you want her to see 1997....)he is alluding(last days of 1996) to his interpretation of spiritual text concerning the DAUGHTER of Zion and the last days before the birth of a nation. (he has written about not respecting the COUNTRY). In other words, I believe he is likening labor to the turmoil of the last days and that both result in birth.
And perhaps here I can reference something said by Brian David Mitchell aka Immanuel David Isaiah, the 2002 Utah kidnapper. This is from his Journal Writings, if I'm not mistaken:
(Purchased one week before Christmas, the baby doll symbolizes the birth of Zion.)
I believe that's the correct quote, if not mistaken. Mitchell also mentions in the Journal Writings that (RED SILK pajamas) were significant to him during the 2002 Utah kidnapping, if I'm not mistaken. (Did he find it significant because he interpreted RED as SIN and SILK as wealth. This would be something similar to the asking of $118,000 by the Ramsey intruder. That is, if I am correct in suggesting that the $118,000 is alluding the ISAIAH 1:18 and the idea that the intruder was saying that wealth was sinful and repenting was necessary. In the 1996 Ramsey case, the intruder said that the money must be placed in a BROWN paper bag, and, if I'm not mistaken, the color BROWN can represent HUMILITY. In the 2002 UTAH case, the red silk pajamas were changed into the garment of HUMILITY, if I'm not mistaken.)
But, just to be clear, I have no way of knowing if Brian David Mitchell has ever even set foot in the state of Colorado. But, in comparing the two kidnapping-related cases (1996 Colorado and 2002 Utah), I have come around to believing that the intruder in the Ramsey case was of a similar mindset as kidnapper Mitchell's. And, of course, Mitchell is not the only person capable of possibly misusing spiritual text to rationalize criminal behavior. But since he is a convicted kidnapper of a blond girl from a large home in a mountain setting and he has apparently misspelled POSSESSSION by shorting it a letter S (I believe the intruder in the RAMSEY case has a problem with double letters as possibly additionally evidenced by his BUSSINESS misspelling), why not rule him out? Of course, that may have already been done, Mitchell may already be ruled out? (DNA evidence) But, like I said, I do believe the intruder in the Ramsey case was of, at least, a somewhat similar mindset as the 2002 Utah kidnapper Brian David Mitchell and so thus I would ask that if Brian David Mitchell found RED SILK clothing significant during his 2002 Utah kidnapping, would the intruder in the Ramsey case have found the PINK clothing significant? And, if so, was that why it was placed in the wine cellar? Was the wine cellar staged by the intruder with colors so that if captured, he could reveal to authorities their intended meaning (that the daughter of Zion was sinful and needed to repent to allow the birth of a new kingdom) and then proceed to plead insanity by claiming he was instructed from above? In other words, I believe he originally planned to commit just a kidnapping with the idea that he could plead insanity if captured by referencing the spiritual slant of his cryptically composed ransom note. But when a planned kidnapping became murder, he staged the wine cellar in the same way he'd written the ransom note: with cryptic meaning that he could reveal to authorities upon capture?
Oh, one more thing I forgot to mention which concerns sections of the ransom note. Since I believe that the ransom note is essentially a series of spiritually slanted sentences, could, near the end of the ransom note's, (Don't underestimate us John....) be alluding to spiritual text's DAVID and GOLIATH? Perhaps, maybe? Also the last line's (It is UP to you now John.), in my estimation, is spiritually slanted similarly to the line....(The two gentlemen WATCHING OVER your daughter do not particularly like you so I advise you not to provoke them.) (does that mean that the TWO GENTLEMEN (spiritually slanted) are considered part of the SMALL FOREIGN FACTION? (which I believe is alluding to (very SMALL remnant) from ISAIAH)). Also the line...(Don't try to grow a brain John), in my estimation, is spiritually slanted according to what I believe was the intruder's interpretation of spiritual text concerning gardens not receiving water? And also the line asking for the amount of money that was to be withdrawn...(from your ACCOUNT). The use of ACCOUNT is perhaps spiritually slanted.